tresoldiacademy.com
RSS
maximios December 6, 2024
Like 0 Liked Liked
Vegan

Invest in Our Future

Buying organic products creates a bankable future for a better environment and a safer food supply for generations to come, says Wendy Gordon, co-founder of Mothers & Others for a Livable Planet.

Wendy Gordon had just given birth to her second son in the fall of 1989 when the Alar pesticide scare began. Alar, sprayed on apples, was ranked as the highest cancer risk to children by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which released a report called “Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in Our Children’s Food.” This frightening study examined for the first time kids’ exposure to and health risks from pesticide-laden foods. It also motivated Gordon to start lobbying for organic farming.

Publicity around the NRDC study increased when actress Meryl Streep joined the outcry demanding cleaner food for children. Streep and Gordon combined forces, and Mothers & Others for a Livable Planet, a Manhattan-based environmental education group, was born.

Gordon, 39, executive director of Mothers & Others, has two boys ages 8 and 11 and holds degrees in environmental health science. In the 1980s, as a staff member with the NRDC — which concentrates on litigation to reach environmental goals — she focused on the toxic substances in food and drink. During her tenure there she discovered her passion: studying environmental issues and how they relate to health. “We hold the power and responsibility over our future,” Gordon says. “If we are provided with challenging information, we’ll make the right choices. The right to know is essential — that’s at the heart of Mothers & Others.”

Mothers & Others’ mission is education. The group encourages safe and life-supporting consumer choices that promote a sustainable future — one that preserves the Earth’s plant and animal species and supports farming practices that produce nourishing food without damaging the environment with pesticides or exhausting the soil. Gordon believes food selection is one of the most powerful political and ecological choices we can make. And, when we refuse to buy into chemical and industrialized farming techniques, we start to solve other eco-problems, she says.

Striking an Environmental Balance

Gordon could recite a litany of environmental issues to address, but she targets sustainability as essential. “To me, sustainability is striking a balance between the extremes of taking too much and giving nothing back to the planet. Our industrialized society has over-taken the natural system,” Gordon states. “We must establish a symbiotic relationship with the Earth. If we proceed in our current direction, we’ll destroy our living systems.” Examine your habits and start asking questions, she urges. “Question our industrial, food and water systems and ask: Who benefits? What are the by products? Is there waste? Answer questions about your most fundamental choices: What foods do you eat? What clothes do you wear? What do you clean your house with? Do the answers harm the environment, the farm worker or a Third World laborer?”

If the answers don’t support ecological systems, make changes. “It’s time to take responsibility for the consequences of our actions,” Gordon says. “What we put in the air, soil and water affects us all. Our first step is to learn to appreciate the ecology of a system and how we’re going to protect it better. We’ve managed to create artificial environments, so we can separate ourselves from consequences. That way we remove ourselves from the problem — but only temporarily.”

Bottled water is a good example. According to Gordon, by purchasing bottled water we diminish our responsibility to take care of the common water supply. “Those of us who can afford it, will, and the problem goes unsolved. We need to collectively realize the reservoir provides us with more than drinking water: It also provides delicate ecosystems and open space,” Gordon points out.

Gordon remains optimistic about even the most monumental eco-problems. She encourages people to take small steps to improve the Earth, and like a single pebble dropping in the water, ever-widening ripples will result. Some of the places you can start:

1. Buy locally grown, seasonal and organic produce. The average mouthful of food travels 1,200 miles from farm to factory to warehouse to supermarket to our plates. Buying local products supports regional growers, thereby preserving farming in your area and requiring less money for transport. Become better acquainted with who grows your food and where it comes from.

2. Avoid rBGH. “This bioengineered hormone used in cows [to make them produce more milk] was an attempt by big business to say factory farming is best,” Gordon contends. “Use of rBGH has the potential to destroy small farms not to mention the animals.”

3. Buy organic cotton. Few people realize their clothes or bed linens contribute to ecological problems. Yet, conventionally grown cotton crops are heavily sprayed with pesticides — a danger to the environment and farm workers. Gordon believes consumers can change this industry by buying organic fibers.

4. Avoid plastics. Many plastics can’t be recycled and end up in landfills. Also, heating foods or storing them in plastic containers can leach out harmful estrogenic chemicals. Reassess your use of plastic containers.

5. Reduce dioxins. Form a group of concerned citizens devoted to helping eliminate dioxins, chemicals that mimic the action of hormones in the body. Dioxins can be carcinogenic and are by-products of plastic manufacturing or disposal. Contact your local hospital and voice your concern about dioxins the hospital might be emitting when it incinerates medical waste

maximios December 6, 2024
Like 0 Liked Liked
Vegan

Do you want to make milks at home?

  • The soyamilk process is lengthy, but it is unbelievably economical! One cup of soy beans cost about 10 rupees. But you produce 3-4 liters of milk, that may be worth at least 100 rupees! The heart patients usually are wealthy people, so they won’t care. But the non-heart patients, the poor ones, should care for this cheaper and healthier product. The rice milk is also similarly very cheap to make. However, both the processes need at least one food grinder, which may not always be affordable initially to the poorer ones. However, in long run, the cost of grinder also is recoverable if the whole family turns to this milk.

  • maximios November 17, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Chocolate Chip Cookies (vegan, gluten-free, oil-free, sugar-free) – Revel in Plants

    revelinplants_chocolatechipcookies-1353479

    Okay I know the title is a bit of a mouthful, but I feel a bit of pride for coming up with this recipe without all the things that people commonly associate with cookies! A traditional chocolate chip cookie recipe will have butter, eggs, glutenous flour and lots of sugar. But who’s to say we can’t break tradition?

    Honestly, chocolate chip cookies have always been one of my favourite desserts and it’s also been one of those recipes that are really hard to adapt to dietary requirements because they have such few ingredients, that every one of them plays a crucial role. Eggs would normally do the binding, butter would keep it moist, and sugar, well, gives it taste. But you know what they say, where there’s will, there’s a way…

    revelinplants_chocolatechipcookies-2-3415113

    This actually started as a failed blueberry scone recipe the other day. The scones ended up having a texture very similar to cookies, so I thought why not alter the recipe a bit and make chocolate chip cookies out of it? And I’m glad I did.

    Gluten-free baking can be a bit tricky, especially considering cookies have that unique texture where they’re not dry but not entirely moist either, and they’re not supposed to be cakey, but not overly fudgy. So to achieve the taste and texture we’d normally expect from chocolate chip cookies, we’re going to use:

    • Almond Meal is a great substitute for regular flour because its got a subtle nutty flavour and natural oils which help keep baked goods moist. However, almond meal doesn’t absorb much moisture so it’s good to pair it up with other gluten-free flours.
    • Brown Rice Flour has a mild, toasty flavour and helps give the cookies a bit of extra crispiness.
    • Tapioca Starch helps bind these cookies together being that we’re not using any eggs and there’s no gluten to gel things together.
    • Dates are my all-time favourite fruit to use to sweeten baked goods. They add a lot of sweetness and a caramel-like flavour to these cookies. 
    • Coconut Cream is used in place of oil in these cookies, keeping them moist yet healthy.
    • Vanilla Extract, of course, for its signature flavour.
    • Sea Salt to even out the sweetness.
    • Baking Soda helps these cookies rise and it also provides a very subtle, salty flavour.
    • Apple Cider Vinegar helps activate the baking soda.

    The trick with these chocolate chip cookies is to help them cool thoroughly after baking. This helps them set and solidify, so please don’t skip this step! (As tempting as it is to dig right in…)

    I hope you enjoy these cookies as much as I did and please let me know what you think in the comments section below!

    revelinplants_chocolatechipcookies-1353479  2 tbsp Tapioca Flouralso called tapioca starch  ½ tsp Apple Cider Vinegar  ½ cup Chocolate, choppedI used carob chocolate to keep it sugar-free 1

    Blend almond flour, brown rice flour, tapioca flour and dates in a blender or food processor. Make sure to only blend until the dates are pulverised and no more – we don’t want the dates becoming a paste! A few pulses should be enough, less is more!

    2

    Pour the blended mixture into a bowl and add baking soda and sea salt and whisk thoroughly.

    3

    Add in the coconut cream, vanilla extract and vinegar. Mix with a wooden spoon until it forms a dough.

    4

    Place in the freezer for 10-15 minutes. This helps the mixture solidify to make the cookies easier to shape, but it also helps the flours absorb some of the moisture.

    5

    Chop the chocolate into small pieces and add to the dough, gently mixing them in.

    6

    Preheat oven to 180C and line a baking sheet with baking paper.

    7

    Shape into balls (about 2-3tbsp of batter per cookie) and flatten them on your palm and place on a lined baking sheet.

    8

    Bake for 9-10 minus. They will still be soft by this point, but they will set while they’re cooling. Make sure to leave the cookies alone for about 30 mins after baking. Trust me! Serve them once they are set and hold their shape well. I personally think they’re even more delicious after sitting in the fridge. Enjoy!

     2 tbsp Tapioca Flouralso called tapioca starch  ½ tsp Apple Cider Vinegar  ½ cup Chocolate, choppedI used carob chocolate to keep it sugar-free 1

    Blend almond flour, brown rice flour, tapioca flour and dates in a blender or food processor. Make sure to only blend until the dates are pulverised and no more – we don’t want the dates becoming a paste! A few pulses should be enough, less is more!

    2

    Pour the blended mixture into a bowl and add baking soda and sea salt and whisk thoroughly.

    3

    Add in the coconut cream, vanilla extract and vinegar. Mix with a wooden spoon until it forms a dough.

    4

    Place in the freezer for 10-15 minutes. This helps the mixture solidify to make the cookies easier to shape, but it also helps the flours absorb some of the moisture.

    5

    Chop the chocolate into small pieces and add to the dough, gently mixing them in.

    6

    Preheat oven to 180C and line a baking sheet with baking paper.

    7

    Shape into balls (about 2-3tbsp of batter per cookie) and flatten them on your palm and place on a lined baking sheet.

    8

    Bake for 9-10 minus. They will still be soft by this point, but they will set while they’re cooling. Make sure to leave the cookies alone for about 30 mins after baking. Trust me! Serve them once they are set and hold their shape well. I personally think they’re even more delicious after sitting in the fridge. Enjoy!

    Chocolate Chip Cookies (vegan, gluten-free, oil-free, sugar-free)

    maximios November 17, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Carrot Top Pesto (vegan, oil-free) – Revel in Plants

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-5-2860722

    I was planning to post another recipe later in the week however I was at the supermarket yesterday and for some reason, I was drawn to the carrots with their lush, green tops. I ate the carrots raw, which I love doing. I reckon they’re one of my favourite vegetables. And whenever I go out for brunch, I make a point to order raw carrot juice with nothing else added. Am I weird? Maybe. But it tastes incredible.

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-6-6703577

    After eating the carrots I just realised that the carrot tops looked too nice and fresh to waste. I did a quick Google search and it turns out they’re not only edible but super beneficial for you.

    • They’re rich in Vitamin A
    • They have 6 times the amount of Vitamin C compared to the root
    • They have high chlorophyll content
    • They’re high in potassium

    This means that they may improve your vision, help regulate your blood pressure and may have detoxifying effects on your kidney. (Source) So really, there’s no excuse to throw away perfectly good carrot tops!

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-7-5997840

    If there’s anything I like more than carrots, it’s pesto. (Okay maybe not more, but equally for sure 😅) So a carrot top pesto is a no-brainer for me! I blended the carrot tops with lemon juice, garlic cloves and cashews and the result is so delicious. The carrot tops have a mildly bitter flavour to them, somewhat like arugula, so pairing them up with cashews helps offset this bitterness. Some people like to blanch them, but I didn’t find this to be necessary. And this way, all the nutrients remain intact.

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-4-8617255

    I made sure not to blend this too much because I wanted it to have some texture to it. So make sure not to blend for too long unless of course you want a smooth sauce. This carrot top pesto pairs up beautifully with some gluten-free pasta or even spread on toast for a healthy breakfast.

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-8420062

    If you make this recipe, I’d love to know what you think! Let me know in the comments section below or tag #revelinplants on Instagram.

    revelinplants_vegancarrottoppesto-5-2860722  1 cup Carrot Topswashed really well 1

    Make sure to wash the carrot tops very well to remove any dirt or sediments. Cut off the thicker stalks and discard.

    2

    Blend everything in a food processor or blender. Start slow and pulse until you have the texture you want. This will keep in the fridge for 2-3 days. Enjoy!

     1 cup Carrot Topswashed really well 1

    Make sure to wash the carrot tops very well to remove any dirt or sediments. Cut off the thicker stalks and discard.

    2

    Blend everything in a food processor or blender. Start slow and pulse until you have the texture you want. This will keep in the fridge for 2-3 days. Enjoy!

    Carrot Top Pesto (vegan, oil-free)

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    The Victims Of Ignorance

    This is a message to acknowledge the victims of ignorance, the nonhuman animals. This is for the kittens who were drowned in alcohol, future specimens for Biology students. This is for the mother hamster who was thrown into a trash can because she devoured her young. This is for the puppy who was left in the car during August just a bit too long. This is for the fledgling who was beaten to death by a group of teenagers. This is for the 3 lambs, 11 cows, 45 turkeys,1,097 chickens, and 1 calf that each meat-eating American will consume in an average lifetime. This is for the 240 million male chicks who are killed annually. This is for the dog who was stolen for laboratory experimentation. This is for the 6.5 million dolphins who have been killed by tuna fishermen. This is for the rabbit who was force fed your favorite shampoo. This is for the frightened infant monkey whose “mother” was a cloth “monkey” scheduled to shock him on command. This is for the ducklings who were electrically shocked to prove that electrical shocks can immobilize. This is for the animals. The exploited nonhuman animals. There are people out there who care. There are people out there working to save you. You haven’t been forgotten.

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    McLibel Case – The story of two ordinary vegetarians taking on the giant McDonald's in London Court

    The story of two ordinary vegetarians taking on the giant McDonald’s in London Court

    A small group distributed leaflets in front of a McDonald’s restaurant — The Big McD’ decided to teach them a lesson — A couple accepted the challenge — Vegetarian organizations from all over the world poured in to support — The case should have lasted only a few days, but instead went on for months… years… — Became the longest in British history — Started in 1994, finished in 1997 — McD’ learned its lesson: “Might is not right!”

    The three reports below explain the whole story in a nutshell.

    The McLibel Trial – A Mammoth Legal Battle

    This was a mammoth legal battle between the $30 billion a year McDonald’s Corporation and two London Greenpeace supporters (Helen Steel and Dave Morris). The trial began in June 1994, became the longest civil case in British history in December 1995, and lasted until end of 1996. McDonald’s sued Steel & Morris for libel over a 6-sided “Factsheet” produced by London Greenpeace, entitled “What’s Wrong With McDonald’s? — Everything they don’t want you to know,” which they distributed in 1989/90.

    Approximately 180 witnesses from the UK and around the world have given evidence on all the issues in the case, namely:

    arrow-8375675 The connection between multinational companies like McDonald’s, cash crops, and starvation in the third world.

    • arrow-8375675 The responsibility of corporations such as McDonald’s for damage to the environment, including destruction of rain forests.

    • arrow-8375675 The wasteful and harmful effects of the mountains of packaging used by McDonald’s and other companies.

    • arrow-8375675 McDonald’s promotion and sale of food with a low fiber, high fat, sodium, and sugar content, and the links between this type of diet
            and diseases including heart disease and cancer.

    • arrow-8375675 McDonald’s exploitation of children by its use of advertisements and gimmicks to sell unhealthy products.

    • arrow-8375675 The barbaric way animals are reared and slaughtered to supply products for McDonald’s.

    • arrow-8375675 The lousy conditions that workers in the food service industry work under, and the low wages paid by McDonald’s

    • arrow-8375675 McDonald’s hostility towards trade unions.

    • “The Vegan News” — Vol. 2, Issue 3

      ‘McLibel’ Trial pits activists against corporate giant


      British pair defend anti-McDonald’s leaflet

    • “Vegetarian Voice” — Vol. 21, No. 3

    • It’s “the best free entertainment in London,” according to a British newspaper. This battle is contested by two impoverished campaigners. Originally there were five defendants, but three decided to apologize and avoid any costs, because there is no legal aid to fight libel cases. However, Steel and Morris opted to fight the case, determined to counter McDonald’s attempts to silence its critics.

    • They did not write the Fact sheet; they only defended the allegations made in it against McDonald’s. Steel is a former gardener. Morris is a former postman and a single parent. Their combined annual earnings totaled less than $ 11,000. They are not even a couple; however, they battled together for a cause they believed in.

    • Fast food restaurants have been publicly criticized in many parts of the world for many similar reasons. Some observers have argued that McDonald’s brought suit in England because of its relatively more favorable libel laws. The case most likely could never have been filed in the United States, where the First and Fourteenth Amendments provide protection of freedom of speech and a corporation may only maintain an action for libel if it can prove malice on the part of the person alleged to have made the offending comment. Putting the question of malice aside, a person or company bringing a libel suit in the U.S. must also prove that the information published about them:

    • 1) is defamatory (hurts their reputation and/or good name), and

    • 2) is not true.

    • Thus, if this case had been brought in the United States, the burden of proof would have fallen on McDonald’s. The corporation would have had to prove that the information was both false and damaging to its reputation.

    • In England, it is the other way around. The defendants in this case had the more difficult burden of proving that the criticisms of McDonald’s published in the London Greenpeace leaflet are true.

    • Some 180 witnesses, roughly evenly split for each side, gave evidence in court about the effects of the company’s operations on the environment, on millions of farm animals, on human health, on the Third World and on McDonald’s own staff.

    • The leaflet is still in circulation, with over 1.5 million copies distributed in the UK alone since the libel writs were issued. The defendants argue that every word in the leaflet is true, and thus cannot be considered libelous.

    • Running concurrently with McDonald’s libel suit is a countersuit by Steel and Morris that alleges the fast food corporation libeled them when it distributed a leaflet in Spring 1994 which claimed Steel, Morris and other critics were deliberately circulating lies about McDonald’s.

    • The trial reportedly cost McDonald’s some $9,600 a day. A lawyer for the restaurant chain originally expected the trial to last three to four weeks. But when it passes its first anniversary (June 28, 1995), it was widely reported that McDonald’s had started secret negotiations with Steel and Morris and had twice flown members of its U.S. board of directors to London to meet them.

    • Steel and Morris represented themselves against the burger giant’s team of top libel lawyers. They lacked formal legal training but performed the vast majority of legal preparations themselves, as well as presenting the case in court and questioning witnesses. Some sympathetic lawyers occasionally provided legal advice on an informal basis.

    • The case attracted hundreds of articles in the press (including front-page coverage in the Wall Street Journal) plus international TV and radio coverage in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, France, South Africa, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Japan, Trinidad, Russia, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Thailand and Israel. (In India, animal rights activists Mrs. Maneka Gandhi spoke about this through various media at her disposal. — Ed.)

    • The Verdict and Aftermath
      It was an 800-page Judgement, summarized into 45 pages that the Judge read in Court

    • JUNE 19, 1997: Mr. Justice Bell gave his verdict. Even though the company had spent nearly 20 million dollars, it got awarded only $ 94,000 (which is being appealed). The Judge found the criticisms made in the Factsheet to be true, which is not surprising since the evidence was overwhelmingly in the Defendants’ favor. After the verdict, at a victory rally, the defendants said, “the company found that all its dirty laundry got aired in public during the trial, exposing the truth behind its glossy image.” The company refused to comment.

    • McLIBEL JUDGE CONDEMNS McDONALDS’ CORE BUSINESS PRACTICES — Mr Justice Bell ruled that substantial and significant parts of the London Greenpeace Factsheet criticising the company have been proved to be true by the evidence brought by the McLibel Defendants, Helen Steel & Dave Morris. Of the other parts of the Judgment, McDonald’s won on the basis of controversial legal and semantic interpretations of the meaning of the Factsheet, “What’s Wrong With McDonald’s?” These mainly regarded McDonald’s claim that the Factsheet meant that the company itself directly caused rainforest destruction and hunger in the third world (ignoring the Factsheet’s criticisms of multinationals and the food industry in general). It also inferred that people have a very real risk of cancer, heart disease and food poisoning from eating the company’s food, even though the Factsheet did not say this. The judge astonishingly also ruled that all the comments (bar one phrase) in the Factsheet would be treated as statements of fact which had to be proven by primary sources of evidence.

    • However, the company must be devastated that despite all the disparity and unfairness, the Judge still found it to be factual that McDonald’s “exploits children” through their advertising, that they are “culpably responsible” for cruelty to animals, and that the company is anti-Union and pays such low wages that it further depresses the already low wages in the catering industry. The Judge also found that McDonald’s food was “high in fat, saturated fat, animal products, and sodium” and that “advertisements, promotions and booklets have pretended to a positive nutritional benefit which McDonald’s food ….. did not match” (i.e. that the food is not nutritious and that they are therefore deceiving the public when they promote it as such).

    • OUTRAGE AS MULTINATIONALS LEGALLY PERMITTED TO LIBEL THEIR CRITICS — Judge finds that McDonald’s published unjustified, defamatory statements about the Defendants in an attempt to discredit them, but says this was permissible in law.

    • JUDGE FINDS McDONALD’S ISSUED DEFAMATORY AND ‘UNJUSTIFIED’ STATEMENTS TO DISCREDIT THE DEFENDANTS — but rules the company had the right to self-defence! Pre-trial publication by McDonald’s of 300,000 leaflets and press releases attacking criticisms of the Corporation as ‘lies’ had sparked a counterclaim by the Defendants for libel. The company was unable to bring a single piece of evidence to substantiate its defamatory assertions that the Defendants had deliberately circulated false information. In fact, the judge found that McDonald’s leaflets were ‘defamatory’, ‘unjustified’, contained allegations which McDonald’s knew to be untrue and that ‘part of the motive….was to discredit the defendants’. But, astonishingly, he ruled that this was legally permissible as McDonald’s had a right of self-defence to protect itself since the company was under ‘attack’ from Helen and Dave!

    • JULY 17th FINAL DEADLINE PASSES — McDonald’s abandons legal efforts Thursday July 17th, the four week deadline set by Mr Justice Bell for any final legal applications by the parties in the action. This was passed without McDonald’s making any application for an injunction or costs. The Corporation has thereby conceded a huge victory to the public dissemination of “What’s Wrong With McDonald’s?” leaflets.

    • CORPORATION CONDEMNED IN PARLIAMENT — MP’s Early Day Motions of July 18th call for sanctions against McDonald’s and an end to multinationals’ right to sue for libel.

    • CAMPAIGN UNSTOPPABLE — The Defendants stance in fighting the case has been totally vindicated; evidence in the trial has backed up all the criticisms made of McDonald’s over the promotion of unhealthy food, and exploitation of people, animals and the environment. 500,000 leaflets were handed out in the UK and around the world following the verdict. The campaign has become unstoppable.

    • DEFENDANTS PLAN FURTHER LEGAL ACTION — Plans are now underway to appeal against legal aspects of the verdict and the parts of the judgment which went against the Defendants, to sue McDonald’s hired agents for damages, and to take the British Government to the European Court of Human Rights.

    • McDONALD’S SLAMMED IN PARLIAMENT — Jeremy Corbyn MP has sponsored two Early Day Motions which were put before Parliament on Friday 18th July. They refer to Mr Justice Bell’s findings in the McLibel Trial and slam the McDonald’s Corporation over its ‘deceptive and exploitative business practices’, calling for ‘effective sanctions’ and ‘appropriate compensation’ to be paid by the company. They further condemn ‘unfair and oppressive libel laws’ and call for ‘urgent reform to safeguard public rights’.

    • SANCTIONS — The McLibel Support Campaign believes in the public’s right of self-defence, and is now calling for sanctions to be implemented against the McDonald’s Corporation:

    • (1) The National Food Alliance called, on July 17th, for a ban on food advertising targeting children (NFA — Jeanette 0171 628 2442).

    • (2) The Farm Animal Welfare Network is demanding immediate legislative action to end the cruel practices identified by the trial judge (FAWN — Clare 01484 688650).

    • (3) Trade Unions and labour activists are stepping up their recruitment drive in the catering industry and their campaign for a guaranteed minimum wage (TGWU — Oliver 0181 809 4977).

    • (4) Local residents’ associations are broadening their objections to new McDonald’s stores to include concerns regarding the targeting of local children and the lowering of local wage levels (e.g. NOMAC, North London — David 0181 347 9857).

    • McDONALD’S U.S. PRESIDENT REMOVED FROM OFFICE — Ed Rensi, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, was removed from office at the beginning of July along with his management team.

    • For more details on the Judgement, please contact us or visit the home page at address below.

    • A Plea to McDonald’s New Management Team

    • Please consider cutting in half the number of meat items on your menu, and diverting your R & D budget towards developing and promoting tasty and healthy recipes that use no animal products.

    • “U.S. McLibel Support Campaign” — (802) 586-9628 P.O. Box 62 — Craftsbury, VT 05826-0062

      [email protected] — http://www.mcspotlight.org

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Is Wine Vegetarian? Most probably, the answer is “NO”

    Most probably, the answer is “NO”. Here is another study by Carolina Pyevich, for the VRG.
    VRG can be reached at 410-366-8343, or P.O. Box 1463, Baltimore, MD 21203.

    Although wine usually contains only grapes, yeast, and a small amount of sulphites, which are added and created during fermentation, the processing of wine introduces small amounts of substances not acceptable to vegetarians and vegans.

    Every wine is different and no uniform formula exists for producing them. A clarifying or fining agent makes wine clear by removing proteins from it. If left in the wine, these proteins would denature and form long molecular strands. That would result in wine that is either hazy or has loose sediment floating in it. The agents eventually settle out of the wine. Different proteins serve as clarifying agents depending upon both the type of wine and the desired flavor.

    Some clarifiers are animal-based products, while others are earth-based. Common animal-based agents include egg whites, milk, casein, gelatin, and isinglass. Gelatin is derived from the skin and connective tissue of pigs and cows. Isinglass is prepared from the bladder of the sturgeon fish. Bentonite, a clay earth product, serves as another popular fining agent.

    Organic protein agents are more likely to be used in the clarification of premium wines which cost more than $7 a bottle.

    Egg whites from chicken eggs are used for red wine clarification. Wine makers in France (Burgundy) commonly utilize egg whites in their production. Egg whites generally clarify more expensive wines (above $15 a bottle) or French wines which are expected to age.

    Large producers of wine in the United States usually implement potassium caseinate as a substitute for eggs. Whole milk and casein are two other possible fining agents in some red wines.

    Gelatin can clarify either white or red wine, or beer. Gelatin pulls suspended material out of wine, and less expensive wines may use this method.

    Isinglass is used to fine selected white wines. Germany is one of the main countries that uses this technique. Some American wineries also use isinglass to clarify white wine or chardonnay.

    The most popular substance used to remove the proteins of domestically produced white wines is bentonite, the silica clay. It is used to fine most inexpensive wines.

    Another fining agent of concern to vegetarians is blood. Although blood of large mammals may serve as a clarifier in some Old Mediterranean countries, it use is forbidden in United States and France.

    Both the clarifying agents and the removed proteins coagulate on the bottom of the wine tank or barrel, from where they are removed. The ingredient list will not state the clarifier because it is removed from the final product.

    Kosher wine is a specialty item and it is produced directly for the Kosher market. Kosher wines may be more likely to avoid the use of the animal-based clarifying agents, but not all do so. The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations stated that a wine could theoretically be certified as Kosher if it contained egg whites or if the gelatin were completely removed from the final product. Paper is another agent sometimes used to clarify Kosher wine, as the impurities adhere to paper.

    Jay Dinshah — American Vegan Society — 609-694-2887 — P.O. Box “H”, Malaga, NJ 08328

    Alcohol causes cirrhosis of the liver, oral and esophageal cancers, hemorrhagic strokes, malnutrition, accidents and suicides. Alcohol injures every cell it touches.

    With every drink, you lose 10,000 brain cells. Those cells may be most vital ones for you… Have you ever experienced, that a very few little glitches bring a whole computer operation to a screeching halt or ‘crash’?

    Anger, hatred, lust, greed, or any emotion reasonably controlled under normal circumstances may find free rain when one is ‘under the influence’. How can you tell what a man will do when he’s drunk

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Do We Need Milk to Get Enough Calcium? Recommended Calcium Intakes, and Plant Sources of Calcium

    Vesanto Melina, Brenda Davis, and Victoria Harrison, Registered Dieticians
    Authors of “Becoming Vegetarian” — by The Book Publishing Company, 1-800-695-2241

    Is it possible to build strong bones without cow’s milk? If you grew up in North America you’d probably think not. After all, dairy products are one of the four “essential” food groups and we all know that it’s hard to plan a well balanced diet when a whole food group is left out.

    But wait a minute, if dairy foods are so important for good nutrition and more specifically for strong bones, how can it be that many of the people with the lowest rates of osteoporosis in the world consume little or no dairy at all? It is really quite simple. In addition to positive lifestyle factors such as ample weight bearing exercise, these people eat plant centered diets and therefore need less calcium than people who consume a lot of meat. Animal foods tend to be high in sulfur-containing amino acids, which cause calcium loss in the urine. Thus in countries where the use of animal foods is high, the recommended dairy intake for calcium is often set well above the 400-500 mg intakes typical in these countries.

    All that having been said, one may still wonder who people who don’t use dairy get dietary calcium. They often have the same calcium sources as large boned animals such as cows and elephants: plant foods. While it is true that dairy products are high in calcium, they are far from being the only good calcium sources. Calcium powerhouses from the plant world include many dark greens, legumes, nuts, and seeds. So, if you have decided to reduce or eliminate dairy from your diet, rest assured that it is possible to get enough calcium without milk. The chart that follows gives a summary of calcium-rich plant foods. Provided in the chart is the following information;

    1. Total Calcium Content per serving. This gives the calcium content in mg of calcium per serving. Source: Pennington’s Food Values of Portions Commonly Used.

    2. Fractional Absorption. This tells us how much calcium we can actually absorb from a food. For example, the figure for broccoli is 53% which means that we can absorb about 53% of the calcium we get from broccoli. The figures were derived from Connie Weaver’s work at Purdue University in the U.S.

    3. Absorbable Calcium. This figure tells us how much calcium will be absorbed by our bodies. It is obtained by multiplying the total calcium in a serving of food by its fractional absorption.

    If you would like to compare your total calcium intake to the RDA, calculate your intake by using the Calcium Content column rather than the Absorbable Calcium column.

    Recommended Calcium Intakes

    How much calcium does an adult need each day? To put things into perspective, here are a variety of recommendations from expert groups in different parts of the globe.

    Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) US, 1989 recommends 1200 mg for age 11 to 24 years, and 800 mg for age above 24 years.

    US National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference, June 1994 recommended 1200-1500 mg for age 11 to 24 years, 800 mg for age 25 to 50 (1000 for women over 50 with estrogen replacement, and 1500 at menopause without estrogen replacement), and increase toward 1500 for both sexes over 50.

    Canada, 1990 recommended 700 mg for women 19 to 49, and 800 mg for men over 19 and women over 49.

    United Kingdom, 1991 recommended 700 mg for everyone age 19 and over.

    Japan, 1992 recommended 600 mg for everyone age 19 and over.

    World Health Organization recommends 400-500 mg for all adults. This “Suitable Group Mean Intake” has not changed for the past 30 years.

    Why is there such a great range in the opinions of people who have spent their lives studying calcium status and bone health? The exact level of calcium intake that can be considered adequate is clearly a matter of debate. This is because:

    1. There is no easy, routine way to access calcium status.

    2. The body has the capacity to adapt to a wide range of calcium intakes.

    3. Eating patterns and other habits that affect calcium balance differ from place to place in many ways.

    In setting the recommendations set above, experts have taken into account the lifestyle factors which exist for their respective population groups. To quote the World Health Organization Technical Report #797 (1990) “Populations in developing countries appear to be at less risk from fractures than those in developing countries, despite their lower body weights and calcium intakes, possibly because they smoke less, drink less alcohol, do more physical work (which promotes bone formation), and consume less protein and salt (both of which increase obligatory calcium loss from the body).”

     Food Serving Size   Calcium Content (mg) Fractional Absorption (%) Absorbable Calcium (mg)
    Milk (for comparison only)

    1 cup

    300

    32

    96

    Almonds, dry roasted

    1 oz

    80

    21

    17

    Almond butter

    1 Tbsp

    43

    21

    9

    Beans (pinto, red or cranberry)

    1 cup

    82-89

    17

    14-15

    Beans (great northern or navy)

    1 cup

    121-128

    17

    21-22

    Beans (white)

    1 cup

    161

    17

    27

    Broccoli, boiled

    1 cup

    178

    53

    94

    Brussel sprouts, boiled

    1 cup

    56

    64

    36

    Cabbage, Chinese (Pak-choi), boiled

    1 cup

    158

    54

    85

    Cabbage, green, boiled

    1 cup

    50

    65

    33

    Cauliflower, boiled

    1 cup

    34

    69

    23

    Kale, boiled

    1 cup

    94

    59

    55

    Sesame seeds (hulled)

    1 oz

    37

    21

    8

    Sesame seeds (unhulled)

    1 oz

    281

    21

    58

    Sesame seed butter (tahini)

    1 Tbsp

    64

    21

    13

    Soy milk, Semblance

    1 cup

    200

    31

    62

    Soy milk, Edensoy or Vitasoy

    1 cup

    95 or 76

    31

    29 or 24

    Spinach, boiled

    1 cup

    244

    5

    12

    Tofu, set with calcium, firm or medium

    ½ cup

    258 or 130

    31

    80 or 40

    Turnip greens, boiled

    1 cup

    198

    52

    103

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Write this letter to an editor of your local newspaper on World Vegetarian Day

    Dear Editor,

    LET US THINK

    October 2 has been designated as “WORLD VEGETARIAN DAY.” We are asked not to eat meat, poultry, fish, or eggs on that day. Here are some issues to think about, related to vegetarianism.

    About ENVIRONMENT — The production of meat is a major contributor to the rapid destruction of tropical rain forests, soil depletion and erosion, extensive pesticide use and air and water pollution.

    About RESOURCES — A meat-based diet requires 20 times more land and 10 times more water and energy than a vegetarian diet. Nonvegetarian diets also require vast amounts of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and other resources. Vegetarianism is a step toward conserving these resources.

    About HEALTH — Flesh-centered diets have been linked to heart attacks, strokes, various types of cancers and other diseases because of mold inhibiting chemicals, antibiotics and hormones used to treat meat. The Merck Manual, the most widely used medical text in the world, concurs that populations with high rates of colorectal cancer consume diets containing less fiber and more animal protein fats. The Surgeon General of America also recommends a diet containing such foods as vegetables, fruits and whole grains in place of meat and other foods that are high in cholesterol and saturated fat. The report further states that cholesterol is found in foods of animal origin, such as eggs, meat, poultry, fish.

    About PROTEINS — American Dietician’s Association affirms that a vegetarian diet can meet all nutritional needs, and that most of mankind for much of human history has subsisted on near vegetarian diets. Only the meat industry propagates that without meat you will not get the right proteins (and trace elements, vitamins & minerals).

    About HUMANITY — Over 5 billion farm animals suffer horribly in confined spaces where they are denied fresh air, exercise or any emotional stimulation, and then they are killed for their flesh.

    About WORLD HUNGER — Over 80% of the grain grown in the United States is fed to animals destined for slaughter, while 20 million people die annually world wide, due to hunger and its effects. The United States is also the world’s largest importer of beef and fish, and some of these imports come made from countries where people are starving.

    About TASTY, CONVENIENT MEALS — There are many delicious and simple vegetarian dishes that do not involve extensive preparations.

    On the other hand, there seems to be no reason to eat meat, other than habit and/or apathy!

    Signed (Your name)

    maximios November 8, 2024
    Like 0 Liked Liked
    Vegan

    Protein and a Health-Supporting Diet – Dr. McDougall

    John McDougall, M.D. (From New York Times Best Seller “The McDougall Plan”)

    • arrow-2858202 Are Americans among the most malnourished people in the world?

    • arrow-2858202 Are the meat and dairy industries brainwashing us?

    • arrow-2858202 Is the medical profession ignorant about our nutritional needs?

    • arrow-2858202 Has our government given us faulty information on proper diets?

    Yes is the answer to all of the above…

    Proteins provide important materials to build and maintain our hormones, enzymes, muscles, and many other body tissues. Accurate estimates of human adult protein needs determined by careful studies show that as little as 2.5 percent of our daily calorie intake can be safely provided in the form of protein. This amount is equivalent to a little less than 20 grams — two thirds of an ounce — for an adult man. The World Health Organization (WHO) has established a higher minimum daily requirement for protein to be approximately 5 percent of the daily intake, but many populations have lived in excellent health on less than this amount. (Protein requirements for pregnancy set by the WHO are 6 percent, and for lactation 6.7 percent of the daily calorie intake.)

    An average working man consumes 3,000 calories a day, so 5 percent of the total would be 150 calories from protein. Since each gram of protein is equal to 4 calories, this would represent 37 grams of protein. An average woman consuming 2,300 calories a day needs 29 grams of protein. These minimum requirements provide for a large margin of safety that easily covers people who theoretically could have greater protein needs. This quantity of protein is almost impossible to avoid if enough food is consumed to meet daily calorie needs. For example, 3,000 calories of rice alone would provide 60 grams of highly usable protein.

    The building blocks of protein are called amino acids. Varied combinations among twenty amino acids form the proteins found in all kinds of living creatures. All sources of unprocessed foods, including meat, dairy, fish, shellfish, plants, and microorganisms contain all twenty of these amino acids. However, the amount of each amino acid that is present varies among different foods. Plants make all of them from carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and water. Animals, including humans, can synthesize some of the needed amino acids, but others must be obtained from their food. The amino acids that cannot be synthesized and which must be provided by the diet are known as essential amino acids.

    Protein Studies on Rats

    Many people believe that animal foods contain protein that is superior in quality to the protein found in plants. This is a misconception dating back to 1914, when Osborn and Mendel studied the protein requirements of laboratory rats. They found that rats grew better on animal sources of protein than on vegetable sources. Investigators at that time suspected that the vegetable foods had insufficient amounts of some of the amino acids essential for the normal growth of rats. Because of these and other animal-based experiments, flesh, eggs and dairy products were classified as superior or “Class A” protein sources. Vegetable proteins were designated inferior or “Class B” proteins.

    Studies in the mid-1940s found that ten amino acids were essential for a rat’s diet. If the level of anyone amino acid was low, the rats could not efficiently utilize the protein and failed to grow normally. Animal products, such as meat, poultry, milk, and eggs, were found to contain these ten essential amino acids in just the right proportions for rats.

    Based on these early rat experiments the amino acid pattern found in animal products was declared to be standard by which to compare amino acid pattern of vegetable foods. According to this concept, wheat and rice were declared deficient in lysine, and corn was deficient in tryptophan. It has since been shown that the initial premise that animal products supplied the most ideal protein pattern for humans, as it did for rats, was incorrect. Therefore, the idea that vegetable foods were deficient in certain amino acids for our needs was inappropriately based on a standard diet ideal for rats. At that early time no one knew the actual protein or amino acid requirements for humans.

    In 1952 William Rose completed a long series of experiments to determine the amino acid requirements for human males. He fed his subjects a synthetic mixture of corn (maize) starch, sucrose, butter fat, vitamins, and highly purified amino acids, and then gradually eliminated one amino acid at a time.

    The study used a chemical measurement called nitrogen balance to determine whether the subjects were getting enough usable protein from the mixture. When an essential amino acid was given in insufficient amounts for approximately two days, all subjects complained of similar symptoms: a clear increase in nervous irritability, extreme fatigue, and a profound failure of appetite. The subjects were unable to continue the amino-acid-deficient diets for more than a few days at a time. From his experiments Dr. Rose found that only eight of the ten amino acids essential to rats were also essential to people. Arginine and histidine, the two other amino acids that were found essential in the rat’s diet, were not essential to human adults. (However, histidine is essential in diets of young children, and aginine is made slowly by infants. Plants are excellent sources of both of these amino acids and easily satisfy these amino acid needs of growing young children.)

    Through these studies, Rose determined a minimum level of intake for each of the essential amino acids. He found small amounts of variation in individual needs among his subjects, but these differences did not seem to correlate with their weight or metabolic rate. Because of these unexplained differences among people, he included a large margin of safety in his final conclusion on minimum amino acid requirements. For each amino acid he took the highest recorded level of need in any single subject as his minimum requirement, and then doubled that amount for a recommended requirement described as “a definitely safe intake.” It is important to realize that even his higher requirement is easily met by a health-supporting diet centered around any single starch. In all but very young children, as long as energy needs are satisfied by unprocessed starches, protein needs are automatically satisfied in almost every situation because of the basic and complete design of the food. Infants less than two years of age have difficulty consuming enough vegetable foods to meet their calorie needs because of the immaturity of their digestive systems and the bulky nature of some starches. Therefore, as commonly practiced before modernization of societies, infants should obtain at least 25 to 50 percent of their diet from breast milk (or the best milk substitute available).

    The results of Rose’s study are summarized below, under “minimum requirements.” From the chart, is it clear that even single vegetable foods contain more than enough of all amino acids essential for humans.

    ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS OF SELECTED FOODS

    Rose’s Rose’s Beef

    (Grams per day) Minimum Recom. Brown Oatmeal Wheat White Broccoli club

    AMINO ACIDS Require. Require. Corn rice flakes flour beans Asparagus Tomatoes steaks Egg Milk

    Tryptophan 0.25 0.50 0.66 0.71 1.40 1.80 1.80 3.90 3.80 1.40 3.10 3.80 2.30 Phenylalanine 0.28 0.56 6.13 3.10 5.80 5.90 10.90 10.20 12.20 4.30 11.20 13.90 7.70 Leucine 1.10 2.20 12.0 5.50 8.10 8.00 17.0 14.60 16.50 6.10 22.40 21.00 15.90 Isoleucine 0.70 1.40 4.10 3.00 5.60 5.20 11.30 11.90 12.80 4.40 14.30 15.70 10.30 Lysine 0.80 1.60 4.10 2.50 4.00 3.20 14.70 15.50 14.80 6.30 23.90 15.3.0 12.50 Valine 0.80 1.60 6.80 4.50 6.40 5.50 12.10 16.00 17.30 4.20 15.10 17.70 11.70 Methionine 0.11 0.22 2.10 1.10 1.60 1.80 2.00 5.00 5.10 1.10 6.80 7.40 3.90 Threonine 0.50 1.00 4.50 2.50 3.60 3.50 8.50 9.90 12.50 4.90 12.10 12.00 7.40

    Total Protein 20.00 37.00 109.00 64.00 108.00 120.00 198.00 330.00 338.00 150.00 276.00 238.00 160.00

    (WHO)

    Many investigators have measured the capacity of plant foods to satisfy protein needs. Their findings show that children and adults thrive on diets based on single or combined starches, and grow healthy and strong. Furthermore, many investigators have found no improvement by mixing plant foods or supplementing them with amino acid mixtures to make the combined amino acid pattern look more like that of flesh, milk, or eggs. In fact, supplementing a food with an amino acid in order to conform to a contrived reference standard can create amino acid imbalances. For example, young children fed diets based on wheat or corn and supplemented with the amino acids tryptophan and methionine in order to conform to the standard requirements set by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) developed negative responses in terms of nitrogen balance (the body’s utilization of protein.)

    Many books popular among vegetarians today place great emphasis on combining vegetable foods to create an amino acid pattern that resembles that found in animal foods. This emphasis is unnecessary and implies that it is difficult to obtain complete sources for synthesizing proteins from vegetables without detailed nutritional knowledge. Because of this complicated and incorrect idea, people are frightened away from vegetable-based diets. Nature has designed vegetable foods to be complete. If people living before the age of modern dietics had had to worry about achieving the correct protein combinations in their diets, our species would not have survived for these millions of years. Humans have related to the world of food with primarily one drive — hunger — and in response to this one basic drive our needs for calories, proteins, amino acids, essential fat, fibre, vitamins and minerals have been satisfied. In fact, one who follows the advice for protein combining can unintentionally design a diet containing an excessive and therefore harmful amount of protein by including too many high-protein legumes.

    As the many amino acid studies have shown, the foods that provide correct nutrition for rats are not necessarily the same for humans. The diet of a rat is considerably different from that of a human. Based on weight, the adult rat requires three and a half times as much protein as a human, and the individual amino acids required are considerably different. Because a rat grows rapidly into adult size compared with a person, the rat’s requirements for protein are much higher. This difference in need is especially clear when the breast milk of the two spices is compared. The protein of rat breast milk is ten times more concentrated than that of the milk intended for human babies.

    The pictures one often sees of “protein-deficient” children in areas of famine in Asia or Africa are actually pictures of starvation, which is more accurately described as calorie deficiency. When these children come under medical supervision, they are nourished back to health with their local diets of corn, wheat, rice, and/or beans. Children recovering from starvation grow up to eighteen times faster than usual and require a higher protein content to provide for their catch-up in development. This exaggerated protein need can be met by a variety of starchy foods.

    Calcium Loss Caused by Excess Proteins

    Eating excessive amounts of proteins can seriously damage our health. When our diet contains more proteins than we need, the excess is broken down in the liver and excreted through the kidneys as urea. This protein breakdown product is called BUN, or blood urea nitrogen. Urea has a diuretic action, which caused the kidneys to work harder and excrete more water. Along with water, minerals are lost in the urine, and one of the most important minerals lost in this manner is calcium.

    On the average, Americans take in a little more than 100 grams of protein and 800 milligrams of calcium daily. In general, studies have shown that young men consuming diets containing more than 95 grams of protein daily developed a negative calcium balance, even with very high calcium intakes. However, in one long-term study, investigators measured calcium balance in adults and found that when subjects consumed as little as 75 grams of protein a day, even with daily intakes as high as 1400 milligrams of calcium, more calcium was lost in urine then was absorbed into the body from the diet (a negative calcium balance). This would mean that most westerners have a net loss of calcium from their bodies every day. The deficit must be made up from the body stores of calcium, which are primarily the bones. The end result of this continuous process is calcium-deficient bones that break with the slightest provocation, such as a sneeze that can crack a rib or a normal step that can break a hip. This condition is called osteoporosis, and in affluent societies it occurs in about 25 percent of women over the age of sixty-five. By the time of diagnosis, 50 to 75 percent of the original bone material has been lost from the skeleton. Observations of various populations worldwide show that the higher the protein intake, the more common is osteoporosis. Bantus living in Africa on low-protein vegetable diets, consuming 47 grams of protein and 400 milligrams of calcium, are essentially free of osteoporosis. Genetic relatives of Bantu, a population of blacks investigated in the United States, consume a rich diet with plenty of meat and dairy foods, yet have osteoporosis nearly as commonly as do whites. An excellent example of the effects of excess protein is seen in native Eskimos who consume a diet very high in protein — 250 to 400 grams a day from fish, walrus, and whale, along with a high calcium intake of more than 2,000 milligrams from fishbones. Yet these very physically active people have one of the highest rates of osteoporosis in the world.

    The effect of protein on calcium metabolism suggests a benefit from a low-protein diet in the treatment of osteoporosis, because lowering the protein content of the diet is the most effective means of restoring a positive calcium balance. So it would follow that one of the measures of preventing this condition should also include a low-protein diet. Other factors are also involved in this condition, including physical activity and hormone status.

    Kidney Damage

    The calcium lost in high-protein diets ends up in the urine and results in high levels of calcium in the kidney system. This contributes to the formation of painful calcium kidney stones. Calcium stones are the most common type found in persons in affluent societies. So, a health-supporting diet that emphasizes low-protein foods would also prevent the formation of calcium kidney stones in most people and would be of particular benefit to those who suffer from recurring stones.

    For certain individuals, limiting the intake of protein can be essential not only for improving health but for staying alive. Protein consumed in excess of our needs causes destruction of kidney tissue and progressive deterioration of kidney function. By the eighth decade of life, people in affluent societies commonly lose 75 percent of their kidney function. In someone with normal kidneys this loss rarely becomes significant because of the tremendous extra capacity the healthy kidney possesses. However, when a person suffers from an additional disease of the kidney, such as diabetes, surgical loss, or injury from toxic substances, the damage caused by the protein becomes critical. People with partial loss or damage to their kidneys, when placed on a protein-restricted diet, are able to preserve much of their remaining kidney function. Those unfortunate patients left on high-protein diets show progressive deterioration of their kidneys to a point where all too soon most will end up needing help from kidney machines.

    The body’s capacity to store protein is minimal, at most. Protein consumed in excess of the amount needed for growth and tissue replacement is excreted. The liver and kidneys enlarge from the added work load of protein metabolism. Osteoporosis and kidney stones are common consequences of prolonged consumption of high-protein foods.

    Protein is broken down in the liver, and the waste products are excreted through the kidneys. Failure of either these organs to function normally will result in a buildup of protein breakdown products. Accumulation of these products will make a person extremely ill. On a low-protein diet, people with kidney or liver failure improve dramatically. There are other dietary restrictions placed on kidney and liver patients. For example, it is extremely important for the sodium, potassium, and phosphates in the diet to be kept low with most kidney disease. Dietary and medical management of people with these and other serious ailments require the strict supervision of someone trained in this type of care.

    High-protein foods are generally high in purines, which are the primary building blocks of our generic code material, DNA and RNA. Purines break down to form uric acid (not urea). The collection of uric acid in the joints leads to gout, a painful and deforming type of arthritis. Uric acid concentrated in the kidney system also leads to formation of uric acid kidney stones in susceptible people. Kidney stones are prevented and gout is easily cured with a low-protein, low-purine diet.

    Protein Content in Various Foods

    Most animal products are inherently high in protein content. When the fat is removed from a food, the percentage of calories present as protein proportionately increases. For example, when the fat is removed from whole milk to produce skim milk, the relative protein content doubles. Therefore, removing the fat from a food is not without adverse nutritional consequences.

    Vegetable products are usually lower in protein content than are animal products. The most important exceptions are the legumes, which include beans, peas, and lentils. These foods can be consumed easily in amounts large enough to yield a diet containing excessive protein. If you are in good health, legumes should be used in no more than one meal per day. The amount should not exceed one cup of cooked legumes per meal. Other high-protein vegetable foods, such as asparagus, lettuce, yeast, and spinach, usually are consumed in such small amounts that they don’t have to be consciously limited by healthy people. Those who are placed on severe protein-restricted diets should avoid all high-protein vegetable foods from the table below.

    Misunderstandings about calcium and protein by lay persons and professional nutritionists have led to the inclusion of excessive amounts of flesh, dairy foods, and eggs in the western diet. Fortunately, the scientific studies performed during the last half-century clearly demonstrate that a starch-centered diet, with the addition of fruits and vegetables, supplies an excellent protein source and is thereby one of the foundations for excellent nutrition.

    Percent of Calories in Selected Foods Low-protein vegetable foods

    apple 1 mangos 4 dates 3 coconuts 5

    pineapple 3

    Medium-protein vegetable foods

    chestnuts 6 corn 12 oranges 8 spaghetti 14 rice 8 oatmeal 15 honeydew melons 10 whole wheat bread 16

    almonds 12

    High-protein vegetable foods

    celery 21 lettuce 34 artichokes 22 asparagus 38 navy beans 26 tofu 44 peas 28 spinach 49 lentils 29 tempeh 49

    soybeans 34 yeast 57

    Animal Foods

    human breast milk 5 milk (skim-0% fat) 41 milk (whole–3.5%) 21 turkey 41 cheddar cheese 25 chicken (light-skinned)76 yogurt 28 cottage cheese 79 milk (low-fat-2%) 28 shrimp 84 hamburger 34 tuna in water 88

    mackerel fish 37

    The important points to remember are that except for a diet based on low calorie fruits, unprocessed plant foods easily meet protein needs for adults and children, and that excess intake of protein is the real potential for trouble. Protein-depleted starches and simple sugars are sometimes added to the diet of people with kidney and liver disease in order to lower the protein content of the diet even further.

    Adapted with kind permission from New York Times Best Seller, “The McDougall Plan,” by John A. McDougall, M.D. & Mary A. McDougall, printed by New Win Publishing, Inc. Dr. John A. McDougall graduated from Michigan State University Medical School, received certification from the American Board of Internal Medicine and the National Board of Medical Examiners and is Assistant Clinical Professor at the University of Hawaii School of Medicine. Mary A. McDougall, L.P.N., specializes in nutrition.

    Dr. McDougall’s Right Foods, is a mission-orientated company that has made great health effortless. The McDougall Program at St. Helena Hospital in the Napa Valley, is a live-in experience, that assures success with the McDougall Program (the professional staff locks you up for 12 days of summer camp). At The McDougall Wellness Clinic, you will feel like the most important person in the world, when you call for help. If you have any questions, or ideas you would like to share, please write or call.

    The McDougall Wellness Clinic PO Box 14039 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Telephone: (707) 576-1654 FAX: (707) 576-3313 Book orders: (800) 570-1654

    [email protected]

    http://www.drmcdougall.com

    Dr. McDougall’s Right Foods 101 Utah Avenue San Francisco, CA Telephone: (415) 635-6000 FAX: (415) 635-6010 Food Orders: (800) 367-3844

    [email protected]

    http://www.rightfoods.com

    The McDougall Program St. Helena Hospital 605 Sanitarium Dr. Deer Park, CA 94576 (707) 963-6365

    Reservations: (800) 358-9195

    Other Recommended McDougall Books:

    The McDougall Quick and Easy Cookbook The McDougall Program — Twelve Days to Dynamic Health The McDougall Program for a Healthy Heart The McDougall Program for Maximum Weight Loss The New McDougall Cookbook McDougall’s Medicine — A Challenging Second Opinion

    The McDougall Health-Supporting Cookbooks — Volumes I & II

    Most natural food stores already stock healthy and delicious, low-fat “McDougall’s Right Foods.” If not, you can ask them to order.

    NATIONAL: Whole Foods

    CANADA:
    Loblaw

    CALIFORNIA: Albertson’s Lucky’s Raleys Safeway Vons/Pavillion Food 4 Less Wild Oats Mothers Hughes

    Food for Thought

    COLORADO:

    Wild Oats/Alfalfa’s
    King Soopers

    CONNECTICUT:

    Haymarket

    WASHINGTON DC:

    Sutton Place

    FLORIDA:

    Publix Markets

    ILLINOIS:

    Byerlys Dominick’s Finer Eagle 90 Franklin Foods Hyde Park Co-op Jewel Food Stores Treasure Island

    Sunset Foods

    IOWA:

    Cub Foods

    KENTUCKY:

    Valu Markets

    MASSACHUSETTS

    Nature’s Heartland
    Wild Harvest

    MICHIGAN:

    D&W Food Center Busch’s Valueland Farmer’s Markets Felpausch Harbor Town Meijer Oak Ridge

    Vics World Class

    MISSOURI:

    Marsh
    Schnuck Markets

    NEW YORK:

    Hay Market
    Food Emporium

    OHIO:

    The Andersons Chereh Hills Dorothy Lane Heinens Jungle Jim

    Meijer

    WISCONSIN:

    Copps Nutrition Gold’s Pick n Save Fleming-Sentry Kohl’s Magic Mill

    Sentry Super Saver

    «‹ 2 3 4 5›»

    Recent Posts

    • The Vegetarian Athletes
    • Kosher Parve Certification – What Advantage it Offers to a Vegetarian or a Vegan
    • Children Mortgaged for Money
    • Losing Meat But Keeping a Child Diet Balanced
    • Rendering Plants — Recycling of Dead Animals and Slaughterhouse Wastes

    Надежные складные ножи с фиксатором безопасны в использовании среди складных ножей.

    Official APK file chicken road game apk for Android Chicken Road users.

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • March 2022
    • February 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • June 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • January 2010
    • September 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • January 2009
    • November 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • August 2007
    • June 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • September 2005
    • April 2001

    Categories

    • Vegan
    Back to top
    © tresoldiacademy.com 2025
    Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes